Russia explains failure of US-made Patriot systems in Saudi Arabia

2019/09/19

US-made air defense systems failed to repel the drone attack on oil facilities in Saudi Arabia because the American systems did not correspond to their stated specifications, a senior official at the Russian Ministry of Defense said.

As many as 88 launchers of MIM-104 Patriot systems, of which 36 are PAC-2 and 52 are PAC-3 modifications, currently protect the northern border of Saudi Arabia. In addition, there are three US Navy destroyers in the Persian Gulf off the coast of the kingdom. The destroyers are armed with Aegis missile defense systems with 100 SM-2 modification missiles.

"How could such a powerful air defense system miss dozens of drones and cruise missiles? There can be only one explanation to this: Patriot and Aegis air defense systems, which the Americans advertise, do not correspond to their stated specifications. They have low combat efficiency when it comes to counteraction to small-sized air targets and cruise missiles," the official said.

Russia and Iran build powerful alliance countering USA and Saudi Arabia

"US-made air defense systems are simply not ready to repel enemy's air attack in a real combat situation," the official added.

The attack on Saudi Aramco facilities in Saudi Arabia took place in the morning of September 14. Riyadh and Washington accuse Tehran of the drone attack, because the latter supports Yemeni Houthi rebels, who claimed responsibility for the attack. According to the Saudi Ministry of Defense and Aviation, 18 unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and seven cruise missiles were used for the attack on Saudi Aramco facilities. US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo, commenting on the inactivity of MIM-104 Patriot systems, said that air defense systems may not always show the desired result.

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif stated that any attack on Iran that may take place as a result of the drone attack on oil facilities in Saudi Arabia will trigger "total war." According to the diplomat, an attack on Iran will raise tensions in the Gulf and lead to numerous casualties.

"I am making a very serious statement that we do not want to enter into a military confrontation. Yet, we will not blink to defend our territory," the Iranian Foreign Minister said. The minister also said that the USA will need to lift sanctions from Iran to make further negotiations possible.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...

What a No-Deal Brexit May Look Like

2019/09/19

What a No-Deal Brexit May Look Like

by Stephen Lendman (stephenlendman.org - Home - Stephen Lendman)

In his 1962 book titled "Capitalism and Freedom," Chicago School/free market fundamentalist Milton Friedman said the following:

"(O)nly a crisis - actual or perceived - produces real change," adding: 

"When a crisis occurs, the actions that are taken depend on the ideas that are lying around."

"Our basic function (is) to develop alternatives to existing policies (so that) the impossible becomes politically inevitable."

Today it's called shock therapy, its central tenet that whatever government does, business does better, so let it operate free from regulatory restraints - no matter the harm to ordinary people.

It features neoliberal harshness at the expense of social justice, unrestrained predatory capitalism, and harsh crackdowns on nonbelievers.

Far-right Boris Johnson's rage for ramming through a no-deal Brexit is all about institutionalizing the above scenario on ordinary Brits, transforming the country into more of a dystopian police state than already - why stopping him is crucial for ordinary people.

Published in early August, a UK government document called "Operation Yellowhammer" lays out a potential worst case no-deal Brexit scenario.

On Monday, majority MPs mandated its release before Johnson suspended parliament.

It isn't pretty, predicting third world status for Britain if Johnson gets away with his scheme, ordinary people hit hardest, considerable disruption and hardships likely to last months.

If a no-deal Brexit occurs on October 31, businesses and households aren't prepared for the fallout.

One section in the released document is redacted. According to reporters who had full access to Operation Yellowhammer, it covers fuel distribution disruptions and related job losses.

France will straightaway "impose EU mandatory controls on UK goods," it says. The flow of HGVs (heavy goods vehicles) cross-channel could be reduced to 40 - 60% of current levels.

"The worst disruption to the short Channel Straits might last for up to 3 months before it improves...to around 50-70%...although there could continue to be some disruption for significantly longer."

"In a reasonable worst case scenario, HGVs could face maximum delays of 1.5-2.5 days before being able to cross the border." They'll "be unable to (easily) return to the EU to collect another load..."

Brits traveling to and from the EU may face immigration checks and other delays. Transport services may be disrupted.

No disruption in demand for electricity and other energy is expected. A reduced flow rate into Britain "will have an impact on the supply of medicines and medical supplies," making them "vulnerable to severe extended delays."

"Any disruption to reduce, delay or stop supply of medicines for UK veterinary use would reduce our ability to prevent and control disease outbreaks, with potential detrimental impacts for animal health and welfare, the environment, and wider food safety/availability and (infectious) zoonotic diseases (caused by bacteria, viruses and parasites) which can directly impact human

health."

Imported food supplies will decrease, short of causing an overall food shortage. Reduced supplies of certain items will result in price increases.

Possible panic buying will further exacerbate things. While public water services should be unaffected, "failure in the chemical supply chain" is a significant risk.

Various cross-border financial services will be disrupted. So will UK/EU law enforcement data and other information sharing.

Brits will lose EU citizenship, "associated rights and access to services over time, or be required to access them on a different basis to now."

Consular inquiries and other help will be disrupted.

"UK pensioners, workers, travelers and students will need to access healthcare in different ways, depending on the country."

EU states may require Brits needing medical treatment in their countries to pay for services.

"Protests and counter-protests will take place across the UK and may absorb significant amounts of police resource." 

"There may also be a rise in public disorder and community tensions."

"Regional traffic disruption caused by border delays could affect fuel distribution..."

Low-income Brits will be most adversely affected by higher prices and disrupted availability of goods and services.

"Some businesses will stop trade or relocate to avoid paying the tariff which will make them uncompetitive or to avoid the risk of trading illegally, while others will continue to trade, but experience higher costs which may be passed on to consumers."

"Disruption to key sectors and job losses are likely to result in protests and direct action with road blockages."

Johnson and other no-deal Brexit hardliners want escalated neoliberal shock therapy institutionalized.

Disruptions caused by leaving the EU without a deal is their way to force-feed it on ordinary Brits, no matter the disturbing hardships.

VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: stephenlendman.org (Home - Stephen Lendman). Contact at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

My newest book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III."

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...

Hole in Soyuz spaceship will remain mystery for good

2019/09/18

The Russian Federal Space Agency, Roscosmos, found out the origin of the hole in the household compartment of the Soyuz MS-09 spacecraft. However, this information will be kept secret, the head of Roscosmos, Dmitry Rogozin said.

On the night of August 30, 2018, an air leak was detected on board the International Space Station. The crew checked all the compartments and found a hole in the Soyuz MS-09 spacecraft, which was allegedly made with a drill. The hole was found in the household compartment, not in the landing capsule. Therefore, the hole did not pose any threat to cosmonauts and astronauts' return back to Earth. Russian cosmonauts filled the hole with a sealant and covered it with patches. Afterwards, they conducted an ultrasound examination that confirmed that the air leak was eliminated.

On December 12, Russian cosmonauts Sergei Prokopyev and Oleg Kononenko went into open space to inspect the hole in the Soyuz shell from the outside of the spaceship. They opened the thermal insulation and anti-meteorite protection, examined the hole, photographed it and took samples from the surface. The operation to open the anti-meteorite protective shell in space was carried out for the first time in the history of space science.

It was believed that someone on board the ISS had made the hole in the spaceship deliberately to sabotage the space mission. Dmitry Rogozin later said that sabotage remains the only version to explain the origin of the hole. The official excluded the version of production defect. NASA representatives, in turn, noted that the conclusions of Roscosmos did not necessarily mean that the hole had been made intentionally, or with malicious intent.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...

Turkey's nuclear ambition - Akkuyu

2019/09/18

By Andreas C Chrysafis

The provocations by Turkish President Erdogan are becoming extremely disturbing for the Eastern Mediterranean. He insists that Turkey has exploration and territorial rights beyond its boundaries and keeps muscling in on its neighbours with a warning, that it would defend those "rights" and use military force if necessary.

In fact, Turkey keeps provoking one country or another but especially Greece and Cyprus who are both facing Erdogan's bravado charades on claims that; half of the Aegean now belongs to Turkey as well as Cyprus's occupied north including half of its Sea Protection Zone and newly-discovered natural gas deposits.

After forty-five years of military occupation, the Turkification of northern Cyprus has advanced to an extent beyond recognition. The sheer volumes of illegal settlers imported from Turkey (over 400.000) are strategically implanted with one goal in mind; to alter the demographic character of the culturally Greek island! In the next few years this transformation of a systematic ethno-catharsis would become irreversible and if not averted, it's only a matter of time before the historic Hellenic culture of Cyprus - although not part of Greece - vanishes into the history books; just like Asia Minor did!

Don Quixote was chasing windmills and so is Erdogan attempting to bully his way and create havoc with a horde of imaginary enemies by refusing to recognize that developing good relationships with one's neighbours produces greater rewards than making enemies!

In reality, Recep Tayyip Erdogan is facing serious domestic problems and he's desperate to divert public attention from Turkey's slippery road to a destabilizing economy and political unrest. He has been using the nationalist Islamic fundamentalist card for a long time but without success convincing Turkey's secular society. Meanwhile, the Turkish Lira has taken a dive and inflation is on the rise affecting the poorer sectors in society.

With his party's crashing electoral defeat in Constantinople plus Turkey's Syrian and Kurdish war setback have made the President more belligerent. The humiliating defeat is a crude reminder of the attempted coup against him personally three years ago! Without a doubt he has become a bitter authoritarian obsessed with the paranoia of another coup looming in the horizon.

The results of a recent poll shows that Erdogan's right-wing Justice and Development Party (AKP) will continue to lose votes at the next election - as much as 18% swing in favour of the opposition. Meanwhile, Erdogan ­­- a cunning politician - has convinced Parliament to change the Turkish Constitution and since July 2019 he was elected as the first Executive President with increased legislative and judicial powers.

To safeguard his new stronghold the President has chosen fear and incarceration as a deterrent against those imaginary enemies that are "scheming" his downfall.

Western nations on the other hand including Russia have been turning a blind eye to Turkey's aggressive behaviour and continue to supply that country with billions upon billions worth of weapons; weapons the country can ill-afford! Turkey has spent 3.7 percent of its GDP (2015) to global arms procurement and in so doing, has become one of the ten most powerful militaries in the world and second largest army in NATO.

Such colossal expenditure on military hardware certainly shows where Ankara's priorities are: military superiority in numbers and weapons, at any cost!

The President's despotic character makes him the ideal example of a man who dreams, of nothing else but to have absolute power; a man whose judgment nobody dares to question! In political terms: he has become a Grand-Sultan with unprecedented powers and arrogantly has put himself above the law of the land!

Consequently, the Turkish police are authorized to show no pity on dissidents and so far have imprisoned thousands of innocent citizens opposed to the Erdogan government. People are jailed on drummed up charges as "enemies" or as "traitors" of the state; a crime that warrants heavy-handed incarceration or even execution in severe cases!

According to Turkey Purge - an underground democratic group of journalists -thousands upon thousands of citizens are being investigated and interrogated; sacked or dismissed including academics, public servants and judges! Meanwhile over 100.000 citizens are languishing in prisons right across the land.  Such awful figures of social oppression in a "democratic" country (and one that aspires EU membership) are unheard of and can only exist in a state under siege by a dictatorship!

For a war-mongering nation as Turkey, it is imperative to have a powerful army and Turkey's military budget has been on a constant rise. In fact, Turkey's 2018 expenditure on shoring up its military might stood at $19 billion - a 24 per cent rise from the previous year. Source: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

But the ultimate prize for Turkey it's to acquire nuclear-powered technology and it is most anxious to lay its hands on such a technology. One cannot help but wonder why such an obsession for nuclear power. Monies wasted, could be put to a much better use to improve higher living standards for millions of Turks but obviously, that's not Ankara's priorities!

Erdogan is certainly not a fool and recognizes that having powerful weapons will ultimately provide him with a military advantage over his perceived adversaries. Determined that Turkey it's equal to all other countries with nuclear capabilities, Erdogan sanctioned the start of an ambitious and costly nuclear programme.

The first three nuclear sites have already been selected:

Russia is to build the $20 billion Akkuyu Nuclear Plant in Buyukeceli along the coast of the southern province of Mersin. It would be Turkey's first nuclear power station with four reactors and one that has triggered a major scientific controversy and public concern; the region is prone to regular earthquakes and raises fears of a major calamity sometime in the future!

At the same time, millions of gallons of contaminated nuclear waste would be discharged directly into the Mediterranean Sea. The environmental impact could prove catastrophic for the ecosystem but also for the livelihood of people that depend on farming, fishing and the tourist industry. Public protests against the nuclear plant have become a regular occurrence but Ankara pays no heed to such protests. Instead, Erdogan calls to speed up the construction of Akkuyu.

Scientific evidence has not convinced the Erdogan government that nuclear stations pose a danger to public safety and dismisses all arguments against Turkey's nuclear programme. The 1986 Chernobyl catastrophe or the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (2011) are classic examples of what can happen; the Three Mile Island accident (1979) it's another, and so is the SL-1 incident in Idaho Falls (1961).

The above catastrophes certainly confirm that risks to life and the eco-system do exist and cannot be swept under the carpet. Oddly enough, it has been announced recently that Fukushima plant would soon be damping millions and millions of radioactive gallons of contaminated water in the sea to prevent a further calamity from happening!

While progressive nations are doing away with nuclear stations Turkey is driven in the opposite direction. This raises serious questions as to why this country is so determined to lay its hands on a potentially dangerous technology instead of choosing tried and tested alternative sources of energy solutions?

The truth of the matter, nations that use nuclear-powered energy have experienced one lesson; the astronomical cost of shutting down and decommissioning out-dated plants! UK's Sellafield Nuclear Station for example cost £1.5 billion to build and will take over fifty years to dismantle at the exorbitant cost of £121 billion. Regrettably, nobody considered disassembling costs during its design stage!

Yet, Turkey remains adamant. Apart from its Akkuyu Plant another $22 billion deal has been signed with Japan to construct it's second nuclear plant; the Sinop Nuclear Station on the Black Sea coast!

The Turkish Minister of Energy, Taner Tildiz has confirmed that a third plant Igneada Nuclear Station will be build in the district of Demirkoy - also on the Black Sea coast and close to the Bulgarian border. Technology will come from the Unites States and it is estimated to cost over $16 billion.

However, construction of Igneada Plant it's conditional and scheduled to start well after 2023 under the "sole control and management of Turkish engineers and scientists".

Can Turkey be trusted to employ such technology in compliance to international laws and respect the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) terms and conditions?

Historically, Turkey has a reputation of evading signed agreements and if successful in the future to mislead IAEA nuclear inspections (as Iran has done) the Eastern Mediterranean will never be the same again!

Meanwhile the clock is ticking towards a grey and uncertain future for the region but predominately for the Republic of Cyprus that's trapped in the eye of the storm. Due to political incompetence there is little prospect of an escape from Turkey's military expansionist ambitions.

Consequently, to the dismay of most Cypriots, the Turkification of the occupied north has now become irreversible and soon Famagusta would also be inhabited and it seems as if there is nothing a submissive Cyprus government can do to stop this from happening...

September 18, 2019

Andreas C Chrysafis is non-politically affiliated UK published author, a writer, an artist and a strong advocate of Democracy, Transparency, Equality and Human Rights. His published novels based on the island of Cyprus - Andartes and Aphrodite's Sacred Virgins

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...

PravdaReport

2019/09/17
Читать далее ...