Father leaves his two little boys alone at Moscow airport

2020/01/28

The story of two boys, who were abandoned by their father at Moscow's Sheremetyevo Airport, has received an extensive media coverage in Russia.

Viktor Gavrilov, a 41-year-old resident of Komsomolsk-on-Amur, abandoned his two boys at the airport  terminal, having left a note. He wrote that he was forced to leave his children due to financial problems, but he promised to come back for them later. The man's wife accused him of domestic violence. However, it turned out that the woman can hardly be referred to as a good mother too.

'I'll come to pick them up later'

The story of two little boys, left by their father at Sheremetyevo Airport in Moscow, began on the evening of January 26. Officers found the two boys, aged five and seven, after 18:00. The children from Komsomolsk-on-Amur (the Khabarovsk region) had all their documents with them, including school diaries, as well as a note from their father, Viktor Gavrilov. In the note, the man asked authorities to help his children, to temporarily accommodate them in an orphanage:

"At the moment I have a very difficult financial situation. I'll pick them up later. Please do not separate the children. Their doucments are in the backpack. I am sorry, but I do not see any other way out of this," the man wrote in the note.

It became known later that Gavrilov arrived flew Moscow with his children from the airport of Khabarovsk, and then disappeared. In a conversation with airport employees, the boys said that their father had already abandoned them before. As soon as the children were found, employees of the Moscow Interregional Investigative Department for Transport started investigation.

Representatives of child protection services said that the children would be accommodated in a social institution until their closest relatives are found. The boys were left at a Moscow hospital under the supervision of doctors and psychologists. However, it became known the next day that the boy's closest relatives did not want to take them into custody.

Family is society in miniature

Law-enforcement agencies found the boys' mother, Olga Pushkarva, in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. She did not know anything about the situation with her sons:

  • She started a new family and did not live either with her ex-husband or with her children from her first marriage.
  • The woman is pregnant with her third child, but she said that she would be ready to take the boys to her home.

The authorities of the Khabarovsk region are ready to assist in the transportation of the boys to the Khabarovsk region, because their mother is unable to come to pick them up to Moscow.

The couple divorced in 2018, and the court left the children to Gavrilov. After the divorce, Victor stopped letting his ex-wife see the boys. children and did not communicate with her. According to Olga Pushkareva, Gavrilov would frequently assault and humiliate her during their marriage. She had had four brain concussions and scars from stab wounds. When Victor was fired from his job, he came home and shaved his wife's hair off. Olga also said that her husband was doing all that in front of the boys' eyes, telling them that their mother was a very bad woman. At one point, one of the boys stopped talking and started stammering after treatment.

According to Victor Gavrilov, who turned himself in the Rostov region of Russia, his wife Olga would leave him many times during their family life. At one point, she left him and their children completely, while her relatives were unaware of her whereabouts for a long time.

Investigation is underway.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...

Will Trump destroy America if he wins?

2020/01/28

Is the US the only global superpower? Do the Americans love Trump? Will he win the 2020 election? Will he destroy America if he wins again?

Does Russia need the American globalization? Will there ever be time when effective sanctions can be imposed on the United States? Who is going to win the war of civilizations?

Lyuba Lulko (Stepushova), an international observer of Pravda.Ru, asked these questions to Director of the Institute for the USA and Canada, Valery Garbuzov.

Is Trump going to win the election?

"Do you think Trump is going to win the election? Is it the domestic agenda that prevails in the United States today?"

Yes, the domestic agenda prevails.

There is a sign in America: if the president is re-elected for a second term in the year of economic recovery, he never loses.

Therefore, if the economic recovery continues till November, then Trump, of course, will stay in the White House. But there is still time. If problems with economy arise, then he will have problems too.

I believe that the Democrats have wasted all the years of Trump's presidency. They were trying to attack him in all possible ways, they organized his impeachment, but they should have been doing something totally different.

    They should have tried to think how they could raise a young leader who would be competitive in countering Trump.

But they did not. Look how many candidates they have - more than 25. They will not be able to beat him either collectively or one by one. Trump is invincible here.

His trump card is his ability to mobilize people, his electors.

People follow Donald Trump, not all of them, of course, but the number of his followers is enough to win in undecided states. He can win just like he won in 2016. I think that he is going to show the world what he can do this year, just like he did in 2016, no matter what.

It is worthy of note here that the Americans like those people who can stand attacks. Trump is being attacked, but he is still standing, and the Americans like it.

Although as a statesman, Trump is much weaker.

Will Russia respond with sanctions to the USA?

Do you think there will be time when other countries impose sanctions on the United States?  What sanctions can they be?

Sanctions can be different. There are international sanctions that are initiated, for example, by the United Nations Organization, and we believe that such sanctions are legitimate. There are sanctions that one state like the USA initiates, but they put together a coalition.

The Americans initiated sanctions against Russia and put together an anti-Russian coalition very quickly.

Moreover, they are extraterritorial sanctions that target the countries that violate those sanctions.

We consider those sanctions illegitimate, but they work. It would be very difficult to impose such sanctions on the USA.

  • First off, even though many countries dislike the United States, it is still an informal empire of the modern world that has global influence. There are many factors of global influence, starting from the currency, the US dollar. The dollar is a universal world currency that has existed for many decades.
  • Secondly, the United States of America has taken advantage of many international organizations, including the World Bank and NATO. There is a plentitude of other things that make the USA the only superpower in the world. When we talk about globalization, it goes about Americanization of the world in the first place.

When we talk about the Westernization of the East, it goes about Americanization of the East.

Many do not like it, but it is true.

Is it going to end some day? The pendulum will swing.

If we talk about progress, then it is connected with globalization after all. When Trump speaks against globalization, he speaks against the main progressive line. Globalization is a phenomenon that may come and go, but the line continues at all times.

It would be nice if this globalization could work for all members of the world community.

This is not going to happen. The West is in charge, and the West has its own laws and its own Western values. There is the East, there is the Middle East - there are completely different values there, where elements of Westernization come across strong resistance.

The East is too reluctant about globalization, especially when it goes in such a rude manner. Anyway, globalization is the future. At the same time, the future is about the clash between those who endorse this globalization and those who do not accept it. In fact, the war of civilizations is gathering pace right before our eyes.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...

Coronavirus Outbreak, A Global Public Health Emergency?

2020/01/28

Coronavirus Outbreak, A Global Public Health Emergency?

In late December, the World Health Organization (WHO) noted cases of a new virus strain unseen before.

Days later, Chinese authorities confirmed a new coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan City, a contagious respiratory illness.

On Tuesday, a WHO alert cited a "very high (risk of contagion) in China, high at the regional level and high at the global level" - despite few cases of the disease so far outside its epicenter in Wuhan.

At this stage, no coronavirus epidemic or pandemic exists. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) confirmed five cases in the US, linked to travelers returning from Wuhan. Dozens of others potentially ill from the coronavirus haven't been confirmed.

On Monday, Global Research.ca explained that five million cases of common flu occur annually worldwide, resulting in 650,000 deaths, according to the WHO, adding:

The CDC "estimates that so far this season, there have been at least 15 million flu illnesses for the 2019-2020 season, 140,000 hospitalizations and 8,200 deaths in the US." 

"The CDC reports there have been 54 reported flu-related pediatric deaths this season from Influenza B viruses."

On Saturday, the WHO called the coronavirus global risk "moderate," stopping short of declaring a public health emergency of international concern.

According to WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesu, there's an "emergency in China but it has not yet become a global health emergency. It may yet become one," adding:

"WHO's risk assessment is that the outbreak is a very high risk in China, and a high risk regionally and globally."

So far, the above assessment is speculation, not fact.

On Tuesday, the South China Morning Post (SCMP) headlined "Debunking the myths around China's deadly coronavirus outbreak," saying:

The virus is contagious, what's true about many diseases. Experts "are still trying to determine how easily the (coronavirus) can be spread between humans, and if airborne transmission is feasible," adding:

The disease is spreading, to what extent beyond its epicenter unclear. No cure exists so far.

Most deaths have been elderly and middle-aged individuals. Doctors in China are "us(ing) HIV retroviral drugs as part of its treatment plan for the coronavirus infection."

The US National Institutes of Health is working on developing a vaccine, human trials to begin later this year.

Surgical masks are only partially effective. They don't provide an airtight seal to prevent the virus from entering the nose or throat, and it can enter the body through exposed eyeballs.

Public health officials recommend preventative measures, including frequent hand-washing, covering the mouth when coughing or sneezing, and avoiding consumption of raw or undercooked animal products.

China's National Health Commission said dozens of samples from Huanan seafood tested positive for coronavirus, mostly from vendors selling wild animals.

Two Chinese studies suggested the virus originated in bats. A Friday Lancet report said 13 of the first 41 hospitalized coronavirus patients were unconnected to seafood consumption.

Much more research into the virus' origin and how to contain and treat it remains to be done.

Separately on Tuesday, SCMP cited Chinese authorities saying the coronavirus death toll exceeds 100, more than 4,500 others affected.

On Monday, Natural News reported an estimated 44,000 infected with the virus, citing University of Hong Kong academics, including individuals "in the incubation stage of the virus," adding:

"Lead researcher and dean of HKU's faculty of medicine Gabriel Leung said his team estimated there were 25,630 patients showing symptoms in Wuhan and that the number would double in 6.2 days, according to mathematical modeling based on infection figures worldwide as of Saturday."

Confirmed cases outside the Wuhan epicenter of the outbreak are few, less than 100 worldwide so far.

At the same time, the virus may continue to spread in the coming weeks and months, every carrier able to contaminate others.

Natural News quoted Chinese researcher Gabriel Leung, saying his teams research "showed self-sustaining human-to-human transmission was already happening in all major mainland cities and warned" of a potentially much more widespread outbreak, "peaking in late April or early May."

He called for "draconian measures" to contain things. Confirmed cases in the US are individuals returning from China.

According to the Lancet, over 80% of those exposed to the coronavirus will become infected - the incubation period from 2 - 14 days.

Over a decade ago during a Swine flu H1N1 outbreak, the WHO falsely predicted a global pandemic affecting "as many as two billion people over the next two years."

At the time, evidence suggested that the H1N1 strain was bioengineered in a US laboratory, vaccines produced for it extremely hazardous and potentially lethal.

The  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a phony "determination that a Public Health Emergency exist(ed)...as a consequence of confirmed cases of H1N1 Influenza in four US states."

No national or global emergency existed. Claiming it at the time was a scheme to convince people to take experimental, untested, toxic and extremely dangerous vaccines that damage the human immune system and cause health problems ranging from annoying to life-threatening.

Coronavirus cases emerged a month ago, the risk of how greatly it may spread pure speculation.

Though potentially a serious public health issue, it may be containable ahead, outbreaks in China so far the only ones of concern - mainly in the Wuhan epicenter.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...

Russia criticizes Trump’s ‘deal of the century’ peace plan

2020/01/28

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, after his visit to the United States, will come to Moscow to personally tell Russian President Vladimir Putin about the "deal of the century" to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, The Jerusalem Post columnist Lahav Harkov tweeted.

US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu discussed the peace plan during a joint meeting at the White House on January 28. According to sources close to the US president, the "deal of the century" stipulates for the annexation of Palestinian territories by Israel in exchange for peace.

The plan is supposed to put an end to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. According to the deal, the West Bank can be given to Israel. In this case, the international community and Palestine will have to recognize the occupation of the area.

The Russian Foreign Ministry has already criticized the deal of the century. Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia, Mikhail Bogdanov, believes that the American side should have consulted with Palestine during the development of the peace plan.

Israeli West Bank occupation legal?

Israeli settlements were founded in Judea and Samaria on the West Bank after 1967. The UN Security Council considers these territories occupied, while Israel defines them as disputed.

Political observers believe that Trump's plan is designed to produce an effect in the political system of Israel, rather than to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict. The US president is thus trying to show influence on the outcome of the next parliamentary elections in Israel and win the support of US-based Jews amid attempts of impeachment in the pre-election period. The foreign policy agenda may also help Prime Minister Netanyahu, who was charged with bribery and betray of public trust.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...

Many Russians support Russia’s unification with Belarus

2020/01/28

71% of Russians agree that Russia is a great power. As shown by the recent poll conducted by Levada Center, the number of Russian respondents who agreed with this statement reached a maximum of 75% in 2018.

  • The share of respondents who do not consider the country a great power also reached a historic low of 23% in 2018. Now it began to grow again and amounted to 26%. Most of the respondents believed that Russia should not be called a great power: as many as 30% of respondents shared the same point of view in 2005, while 67% disagreed.
  • Most respondents, who answered this question, were guided by the image of the perception of Russia by other countries of the world. In this interpretation, the Russians see international sanctions as recognition of Russia's new role in the world by the West.
  • The decrease in the share of those who consider Russia a great power may be due to difficulties in the interaction of the Russian authorities with Ukraine and Belarus. The perception of Russia as a great power may strengthened again during the US elections if US authorities start talking about the Russian interference in US elections again.

Russia and Belarus to become one?

In the poll, respondents were also asked about the relationship between Russia and Belarus. As many as 44% believe that Russia and Belarus should cooperate more actively in the economic sphere, 28% believe that it is necessary to maintain cooperation at the same level. Thirteen percent support the creation of the joint state with one administration, while ten percent believe that Belarus should become part of Russia.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

Читать далее ...